<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Imaginary Part</title>
	<atom:link href="http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog</link>
	<description>Just another Australian geek&#039;s perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:48:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPhoto to GIMP by Christopher Neugebauer</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/07/iphoto-to-gimp/comment-page-1/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Neugebauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 11:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/?p=178#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>Not quite.  Moving the triangles in Gimp is the same as moving triangles in iPhoto (they really do exist!).

The highlights/shadows thing is actually a curves adjustment (look it up); moving the left (dark) end of the curve is shadows, the right (bright) end of the curve is highlights.  It&#039;s more difficult to get right, but gives a lot more control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite.  Moving the triangles in Gimp is the same as moving triangles in iPhoto (they really do exist!).</p>
<p>The highlights/shadows thing is actually a curves adjustment (look it up); moving the left (dark) end of the curve is shadows, the right (bright) end of the curve is highlights.  It's more difficult to get right, but gives a lot more control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making UConnect suck less with urlyconnect by John</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/making-uconnect-suck-less-with-urlyconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1929</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=151#comment-1929</guid>
		<description>I would be interested to know if this is still a problem.  We (ITR) have made some changes recently which may have an impact on this issue.  We cannot test this ourselves as we have not been able to recreate the problem.

I should add that there is still a second problem with UConnect which is currently being investigated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested to know if this is still a problem.  We (ITR) have made some changes recently which may have an impact on this issue.  We cannot test this ourselves as we have not been able to recreate the problem.</p>
<p>I should add that there is still a second problem with UConnect which is currently being investigated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The friends game by Georgia</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/the-friends-game-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>Georgia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 06:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=140#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>Just thought I&#039;d say hi. I live in Sydney and was watching Q&amp;A last night when I heard &quot;our next question comes from Thomas Karpiniec of Hobart.&quot; I&#039;m from Hobart too and I recognised the name- perhaps from orchestra or primary school or something? Anyway, am enjoying going through the blog, take care!
Georgia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I'd say hi. I live in Sydney and was watching Q&amp;A last night when I heard "our next question comes from Thomas Karpiniec of Hobart." I'm from Hobart too and I recognised the name- perhaps from orchestra or primary school or something? Anyway, am enjoying going through the blog, take care!<br />
Georgia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making UConnect suck less with urlyconnect by TK</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/making-uconnect-suck-less-with-urlyconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1731</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=151#comment-1731</guid>
		<description>Fair enough, I&#039;ll stand corrected: I did assume transparent proxies. It seemed likely that some sort of infrastructure (download monitoring, whatever) required a proxy since we had one in the first place. It could well be NAT and nothing more. Mea culpa.

Either way it&#039;s not really important. Something between the laptops and the Internet is causing the connections grief, so that&#039;s what I&#039;ve tried to work around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough, I'll stand corrected: I did assume transparent proxies. It seemed likely that some sort of infrastructure (download monitoring, whatever) required a proxy since we had one in the first place. It could well be NAT and nothing more. Mea culpa.</p>
<p>Either way it's not really important. Something between the laptops and the Internet is causing the connections grief, so that's what I've tried to work around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making UConnect suck less with urlyconnect by Uncle Tony</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/making-uconnect-suck-less-with-urlyconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 06:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=151#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>&quot;this year they brought in transparent proxies&quot;.  Er... not according to the people who implemented it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"this year they brought in transparent proxies".  Er... not according to the people who implemented it...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making UConnect suck less with urlyconnect by Paris</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/making-uconnect-suck-less-with-urlyconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>Paris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 21:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=151#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>Good job sir, sounds like it&#039;s more painful than ever!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job sir, sounds like it's more painful than ever!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making UConnect suck less with urlyconnect by TK</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/making-uconnect-suck-less-with-urlyconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1723</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=151#comment-1723</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I think I heard about that and forgot about it again... ah well. Good to know.

I recall that corkscrew also often required more than one attempt, so I think I&#039;m still ahead in required effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I think I heard about that and forgot about it again... ah well. Good to know.</p>
<p>I recall that corkscrew also often required more than one attempt, so I think I'm still ahead in required effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making UConnect suck less with urlyconnect by McJones</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/making-uconnect-suck-less-with-urlyconnect/comment-page-1/#comment-1722</link>
		<dc:creator>McJones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=151#comment-1722</guid>
		<description>The old proxies are still there and although they have the old proxy issues it doesn&#039;t however have the tcp dropout, so go for whichever is less of a pain to you I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old proxies are still there and although they have the old proxy issues it doesn't however have the tcp dropout, so go for whichever is less of a pain to you I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Units and prefixes by TK</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/units-and-prefixes/comment-page-1/#comment-1715</link>
		<dc:creator>TK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 07:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=148#comment-1715</guid>
		<description>There was a comment on Twitter too:
desplesda: @atan2 &quot;You can&#039;t have parts of a bit&quot; - sure you can, fractions of a bit are used all the time in information theory! #annoyingpedantism

Obviously that&#039;s correct. In derived units or in probability you can talk about fractional bits. My own pedantic response would be that I said you can&#039;t _have_ part of a bit, which I think implies static possession well enough. So there. :P

Awesome link to Shannon&#039;s paper, Andrew. I&#039;ve been hearing a lot about that chap lately in my communications unit at uni, mostly in the context of maximum data rates through a channel. I&#039;ll definitely read it carefully sometime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a comment on Twitter too:<br />
desplesda: @atan2 "You can't have parts of a bit" - sure you can, fractions of a bit are used all the time in information theory! #annoyingpedantism</p>
<p>Obviously that's correct. In derived units or in probability you can talk about fractional bits. My own pedantic response would be that I said you can't _have_ part of a bit, which I think implies static possession well enough. So there. :P</p>
<p>Awesome link to Shannon's paper, Andrew. I've been hearing a lot about that chap lately in my communications unit at uni, mostly in the context of maximum data rates through a channel. I'll definitely read it carefully sometime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Units and prefixes by Andrew Johnson</title>
		<link>http://1.21jiggawatts.net/blog/2010/04/units-and-prefixes/comment-page-1/#comment-1714</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 06:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://arctanx.id.au/blog/?p=148#comment-1714</guid>
		<description>Sorry for the spam, but this article is really cool. It has CW in it too :)

http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for the spam, but this article is really cool. It has CW in it too :)</p>
<p><a href="http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://cm.bell-labs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
