Either I've recently become a Twitter celebrity without becoming aware of it and somebody somewhere is trying to crack my account, or Twitter hates me. Yeah, I'm going with the hate option. Never assume malice where stupidity will suffice.

So what's my response to all this? Shall I jump up and down and complain that the (free) Twitter service is not working and that I desperately need my constant intravenous flow of tweets to operate? It doesn't sound particularly elegant. Shall I make a declaration that Twitter fails in general and ragequit and try to delete my account? Tempting, but not incredibly rational or practical.

Instead, ironically, I've announced on Facebook that I won't be reading Twitter for a while. And that gives me a little bit of leeway to experiment. For Twitter has become a reasonably large time sink.

When you first deal with Twitter it's easy to fall into a naïve mindset that to prevent your list of tweets being full of crud you don't care about you just have to be careful who you follow. Unfortunately the reality is that perfectly nice and normal people, such as my friends and me, when given an environment like Twitter will fill it with all kinds of garbage. Alongside all the useful stuff you actually care about hearing from your friends. The signal to noise ratio is just bad because community expectations for usefulness of tweet content are not high.

The concept of flirting with the idea of not using Twitter for a while seems a little strange given that we all got along perfectly fine without it. All the same, it forms an inlet and an outlet in your brain which were nowhere near as active before -- an inlet for "I wonder what's been happening in my friends' lives lately" and an outlet for "heh, I just found/thought this thing which is kind of cool/annoying/I feel like sharing".

Previously those outlets had less opportunity to be exercised but they were invigorated by Twitter. When you stop using the service the outlets remain for a while. When I first started having difficulty with my API rate limiting my first desire was to post about it on Twitter. It gets into your BRAIN.

In hindsight I think those outlets were doing just fine before. I shouldn't have to think about what my friends -- or at least those connected to the Internet all day -- are doing at every hour, and I certainly shouldn't be sharing my random thoughts at a rate of several per day. Because they just ain't that good. If there's one thing the Internet is good at, it's showing you just how unoriginal you truly are.

Heck, I haven't even been reading Twitter properly lately. There's just too much crud. I'd never get anything done if I was notified every time a new tweet comes in, and it's something like a chore to read through the backlog a couple of times a day. It's not that the tweets aren't relevant to me or even that they aren't interesting -- they just aren't relevant or interesting enough. We have to draw a line, folks.

So is the correct response to not read Twitter at all? Beats me, but the Twitter website's failure to let me log in seems as good a reason as any to find out. I could go and play with identi.ca but I'd probably end up in a similar problem one day.

I just don't like micro-blogging in principle. I like using big words when they mean precisely what I want to express. The amount of time it takes me to fit what I want to say into 140 characters is significant, as is the amount of semantic intent I have to lose in the process.

Yet Twitter is fun. But it's not, lately. And now it's not working for me. So it can bugger off for a while.

Did I mention I like email? I like getting email from real people. Also phone calls. Just not at 4:20AM like the most recent phone call I got, please.

I think using Twitter to engage in political matters is a dumb idea. There's simply not enough scope in it for intelligent discussion. This evening I got caught in a little argument about free speech and gay rights. After about 4 maximum-size tweets back and forth we realised that we'd mostly missed each other's points. This is not an efficient way to do business.

If you have something intelligent to say about Iran or another political matter you're doing yourself a disservice by trying to express it on Twitter. Get yourself a blog or something---if you're really as interesting and intelligent as you think you are, people will read it and share it.

Political matters are complicated beasts and I believe that they are better served by a suitable length of prose so that your readers can under your context, your reasoning and your conclusions fully.

I suspect that a large proportion of the Twitter Iran enthusiasts would find themselves a lot less insightful than they thought about how to deal with the whole situation if they tried to string together a short piece of writing explaining what and why rather than sitting about all day retweeting URLs of things they found interesting.

You don't have to write to be a good thinker, but you do have to communicate your good thoughts effectively if they're going to be any use to anyone. Something more like a blog makes it easier for others to comment (again with a decent length of text) and get some intelligent debate happening.

Once we get some intelligent debate rather than token snippets of support for whichever side you like most, perhaps we can use the Internet to do some politics. And society will be better for it.